Alaska’s Willow arctic drilling project is a climate turning-point. Biden must say no | Kim Heacox (2024)

President Biden faces a legacy-making – or legacy-breaking – decision in arctic Alaska with the $8bn Willow project, the largest oil and gas project currently proposed on US public lands.

If Biden remembers his visionary pledge – forged in the hard truth of human-caused climate change – that the US will expand into clean energy and approve no new oil drilling on federal lands, then his decision should be straightforward.

He will say no.

The world we live in today is not the same as the world of 1968 when oil was first discovered in arctic Alaska, in Prudhoe Bay. Back then, there were about 200 days a year that heavy vehicles could drive on so-called “ice roads.”

Fossil fuels kill more people than Covid. Why are we so blind to the harms of oil and gas? | Rebecca SolnitRead more

Now, it’s down to about 130. The eight warmest years on record have been the last eight. Oceans across the world are warming and rising and turning acidic. Villages are washing into the sea. Salmon are declining. Extinction rates are estimated at 100 times higher than historic levels. The arctic is heating at twice the rate as the rest of the world. And permafrost in many places is no longer permanent.

The single dirt road that crosses Denali National Park, Alaska’s Yellowstone, is closed at the midway point due to a rock glacier, loosened by warming temperatures, that has slumped down-slope and taken the road with it. To span the glacier will require a $100m bridge, paid for by US taxpayers. That’s money spent because of climate change – and just for one road.

Amid it all sits the oil and gas giant ConocoPhillips, indulged by the Alaska congressional delegation and the State of Alaska, wanting more while already riding a wave of record oil profits, and with many options to drill in the state’s existing oil patch. In February alone, the company applied to drill 45 new wells in Kuparuk.

When asked recently about Willow, the US Secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland, declined to be specific, but said that “public lands belong to every single American, not just one industry.”

If approved in full (not scaled down), Willow would mean the construction of at least 219 wells, 35 miles of roads, and hundreds of miles of pipelines, plus airstrips and a new central oil processing facility, all tied into Prudhoe Bay and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. But with construction comes destruction of yet another wild and beautiful place: silent and white in winter, poetic with rivers, lakes, ponds, caribou, grizzly bears and migratory birds in summer, an Indigenous cultural home and hunting ground for thousands of years.

The American climate migration has already begun | Jake BittleRead more

The Interior Department estimates that Willow would release roughly 284m metric tons of carbon dioxide (a greenhouse gas) over its 30-year lifetime – the equivalent of the annual emissions of about 75 coal-fired power plants.

“This carbon bomb,” the climate activists Zach Brown and Bill McKibben wrote last year in the Los Angeles Times, “would mock [Biden’s] campaign commitments to ease off on new oil leases – and in fact would represent a continuation of Trump-era efforts to drill big in the far north tundra.” The environmental group Evergreen Action says Willow would emit more climate pollution per year than more than 99.7% of all single-point sources in the country.

Some local Inupiat people want Willow, and say it will be compatible with their subsistence lifestyles; others oppose it, some fiercely. “Oil and gas development should not happen at the expense of our health and our survival,” Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, the mayor of Nuiqsut, has said. Nuiqsut is the Inupiat village closest to the proposed Willow site, 60 miles from Prudhoe Bay, where black carbon from fossil fuel production – and reported rates of respiratory illnesses – have increased. “Our communities are not sacrifice zones.”

Outrage as US government advances $8bn Alaska oil drilling planRead more

In recent days, TikTok videos in opposition to Willow have reached millions of young viewers. Siqiniq Maupin, the executive director of Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, says those videos show that people around the world care, especially young people. It’s their future. “They understand that what happens in the arctic doesn’t stay in the arctic.”

Last year, Mary Peltola, Alaska’s lone representative in the US House of Representatives, visited my little town while campaigning. When she told the audience she “believed” in climate change, I suggested she phrase it differently. Climate change is not a religion or matter of belief. It’s science. You either read and accept the peer-reviewed consensus, or you do not. She thanked me, and added that she didn’t think it was a crisis.

But climate change is a crisis. More than 1,000 scientists from 80-plus countries who form the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change say so. Based on the IPCC report, the United Nations calls our current state of global affairs a “code red for humanity.”

Amid all the clutter and noise, Biden must focus on the objective truth of climate change. Willow is a proposed 30-year lease. Think back to 30 years ago. How often was climate change discussed then? Hardly at all. Now go forward 30 years, when climate change, unless taken seriously now, will be the problem that aggravates all other problems, and threatens civilization as we know it.

As for ConocoPhillips and the State of Alaska, both are awash in money. They’ll be fine. Last fall nearly every Alaskan got a handsome check from the Alaska Permanent Fund, an oil account worth more than $70bn. It’s been this way every year for decades. At first it felt like a gift, then an entitlement. Now it feels like a bribe.

What’s at stake with Willow is a critical turning point in the US commitment to addressing climate change. If Biden does the right thing, he will send a signal around the world and inspire other leaders to stand up to big oil and say no – not here, not now, not ever. No compromise, no scaling down.

This oil – all of it on federal land – should stay in the ground as humankind embraces a green energy revolution that takes us into a healthy future.

  • Kim Heacox is the author of many books, including The Only Kayak, a memoir, and Jimmy Bluefeather, a novel, both winners of the National Outdoor Book Award. His newest novel, On Heaven’s Hill, will be released this month. He lives in Alaska.

Alaska’s Willow arctic drilling project is a climate turning-point. Biden must say no | Kim Heacox (2024)

FAQs

What did Biden say about the Willow project in Alaska? ›

On Monday, the Biden Administration granted ConocoPhillips approval for an immense new drilling project—the Willow oil project—in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. The National Petroleum Reserve is most definitely federal land, and it's significantly north of the Arctic Circle.

What did Biden shut down in Alaska? ›

Biden moves to limit oil drilling and mineral mining in Alaska, in latest win for greens. The moves also shore up support from tribes and conservation groups, but face criticism from Alaska lawmakers.

Why should we not drill for oil in Alaska? ›

The Arctic Refuge is an important carbon reserve, locking carbon in the frozen ground. Drilling for oil in the Arctic Refuge would release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. Melting sea ice may drive heat waves and other extreme weather events across North America.

Do Alaskans want the Willow project? ›

Excerpt: “There are many misperceptions about the local community's stance on Willow, many perpetuated by groups with no connection to our people, our heritage, or our lands. We write to make things clear: the majority consensus on the North Slope supports the Willow Project.

Did Biden reject the Willow project? ›

In 2021 the Biden administration defended a Trump-era decision to allow the Willow project to go forward.

Has Biden decided to stop the Willow project? ›

The Biden administration had the authority to stop Willow — yet chose not to. The lawsuit also takes the administration to task for neglecting to consider the additional climate pollution of future development dependent upon Willow project, thus failing to assess Willow's full climate impact.

Why did Biden ban drilling in Alaska? ›

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — The Biden administration said Friday it will restrict new oil and gas leasing on 13 million acres (5.3 million hectares) of a federal petroleum reserve in Alaska to help protect wildlife such as caribou and polar bears as the Arctic continues to warm.

How much oil is left in Alaska? ›

Petroleum. Alaska's proved crude oil reserves—about 3.2 billion barrels at the beginning of 2022—are the fourth-largest in the nation. The state has been among the top oil producers for many years.

Is the Alaska pipeline still pumping oil? ›

TAPS Operations

Throughput peaked at 2.1 million barrels a day in 1988, but has steadily decreased, averaging 480,199 barrels a day in 2020 and 477,798 in 2021. With lower flow levels, the crude oil takes longer to reach the Valdez Terminal – about 2 weeks, on average – and the oil is colder on arrival.

Why is it bad to drill in Alaska? ›

Oil development would bring roads, airstrips, heavy machinery, noise and pollution. This would damage the refuge's fragile tundra ecosystem and disrupt age-old migration and denning patterns for caribou, polar bears and other animals.

Does drilling for oil ruin the land? ›

Exploring and drilling for oil may disturb land and marine ecosystems. Seismic techniques used to explore for oil under the ocean floor may harm fish and marine mammals. Drilling an oil well on land often requires clearing an area of vegetation.

Is it illegal to drill for oil in the US? ›

States require a drilling permit before a well begins drilling. Requirements to receive drilling permits generally include minimum setbacks from lease or unit boundaries, and adequate casing and cementing programs.

Who owns Willow Project Alaska? ›

The Willow project is an oil drilling project by ConocoPhillips located on the plain of the North Slope of Alaska in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska entirely on wetlands. The project was originally to construct and operate up to five drill pads for a total of 250 oil wells.

Is the Willow project good or bad? ›

The climate and environmental impacts of Willow

Once passed, the 1.5 degree-tipping point would precipitate a cascade of devastating effects, including rising sea levels and extreme heat waves, that could lead to millions of deaths worldwide by the end of the century.

Why is Alaska doing the Willow project? ›

WHY IS WILLOW IMPORTANT FOR ALASKA? The Willow project area holds an estimated 600 million barrels of oil, or more than the amount currently held in the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the country's emergency supply.

What was Biden's response to the Willow Project? ›

On the heels of the Willow decision, the Biden administration announced that it will begin a rule to increase protections in the Western Arctic, the site of the Willow drilling project and the largest stretch of undeveloped land in the United States.

Did Biden approve the Willow project? ›

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday upheld the Biden administration's approval of the massive Willow oil-drilling project on Alaska's remote North Slope, a decision that environmental groups swiftly vowed to fight.

What happened to the Willow Project in Alaska? ›

After a court challenge in 2021, the BLM issued its final supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) in February 2023. Alaskan lawmakers from both parties, as well as the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, have supported the Willow project. In March 2023, the Biden administration approved the project.

Is the Willow oil project controversial in Alaska? ›

Using the oil from Willow would produce the equivalent of more 263 million tons (239 million metric tons) of greenhouse gases over the project's 30-year life, roughly equal to the combined emissions from 1.7 million passenger cars over the same time period.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6033

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.